Language Access Work Group
Notes from
Meeting 1 Breakout Room 1
July 25, 2023
Breakout Room 1 Participants Breakout Room 1 Facilitator
Gabrielle Bachmeier Sharon Armstrong
Nadia Damchii
Helen Eby
Marguerite Friedlander, Esq
Jon Gould
Luisa Gracia
Jarrod Irvin
Natalya Mytareva
Carrie Huie-Pascua
Elsie Rodriguez Paz
Casey Peplow
Question 1:
Why is this work important to Washingtonians?
Question 2:
How do you think we reach our unifying goal in the most equitable, accessible, and financially reasonable way?
-
There was a lot of support in our room regarding the importance of providing quality interpretive services through the certification process.
-
Emphasis and focus on students and youths who serve as interpreters for their parents, and one scenario specifically had to do with student-teacher conferences, and how there are clear ethical concerns with those.
-
It is everyone's right to have quality interpretive services. Especially when we are talking about historically marginalized populations. And if we are talking about medical concerns, then a lot of times these include infectious issues and diseases. Now we are further marginalizing people if they cannot adequately communicate fluidly back and forth. So, the need is definitely there.
-
Also, populations that are smaller, their language interpretive services, there is less access to those services because the populations are smaller, but they are growing. There is a clear need, regardless. Access to interpretive services is hard to come by, if at all.
-
Essentially, everyone in the U.S. has rights to quality interpretation services. It also helps create jobs for people within the U.S.
-
One other point, there is room for misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. We were really in support of in person interpretive service because without it is without equality, being able to interpret body language or take in the information equitably, because everybody is receiving it at the same time, lived time and importance of that.